Understanding School Transportation
Each school day, Spring Grove Area School District buses travel hundreds of miles across our community to transport students to schools, specialized programs, and more. Behind the scenes, a lot goes into making this happen safely and efficiently, including complex contracts with transportation providers. This page outlines how transportation works in our district, what impacts costs, and why no two contracts are alike, even when districts look similar on paper.
Why This Matters
We want families and taxpayers to understand what goes into running a safe, compliant, and cost-effective transportation system. Comparing our services to another district, without knowing all of the details below, is like comparing apples to oranges. Even districts that look similar on paper in size, population, or geography often face very different realities. That’s because each district’s student needs, infrastructure, and legal transportation obligations are unique.
We remain committed to prioritizing student safety, maintaining compliance with all state and federal regulations, and being responsible stewards of public funds.
What’s in a School Transportation Contract?
School transportation contracts are legally binding agreements between a school district and a bus contractor. These contracts outline:
- The number and types of vehicles needed
- Routes and schedules
- Staffing and safety requirements
- Equipment standards such as cameras, GPS, etc.
- Maintenance and facility operations
- Special transportation services
- Extracurricular activity trips
- Payment structure and penalties
But what really shapes the cost and availability of services? That’s where things get more complex. Expand each tab below to learn more.
Ensuring a Fair and Open RFP Process: How the District Solicited Bids
Spring Grove Area School District conducted its Request for Proposal (RFP) process for student transportation services in 2021. The RFP was publicly posted on our website and directly shared with transportation companies across south-central Pennsylvania to encourage broad, competitive participation.
Four companies submitted proposals, and Krise Transportation offered the most competitive bid. As a result, SGASD entered into a 7-year contract with Krise Transportation, covering the 2021–2028 school years.
How is SGASD Doing?
Given the challenges facing the school transportation industry, SGASD’s contract with Krise Transportation stands out for its strong value and exceptional reliability. The partnership ensures fully staffed routes, on-time pickups, and eliminates the need for “double runs” due to driver shortages. Krise Transportation has also proven to be a community-minded partner, actively supporting SGASD and the broader community through event participation, donations, and dependable daily service. In short, we didn’t just select a vendor—we gained a partner. Krise Transportation supports not only our day-to-day operations but also our values as a school district committed to students, staff, and the community.
Why Does SGASD Have the Highest Total Cost in York County?
The first chart below reflects total transportation costs of York County school districts for the 2022–2023 school year, which is the most recent data reported by the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE). SGASD has the highest total cost in the county. The second chart developed from polling York County school districts shows the 2025 daily bus rates, and as you can see, SGASD is the third lowest in the county.
Our transportation costs are not the result of a poorly negotiated contract, flawed bid process, or overcharging by our transportation provider. In fact, our daily rates for buses and vans are among the lowest in York County.
So how can SGASD have one of the lowest daily bus rates, but the highest total transportation cost?
2022-23 Total Cost by School District by SGASD
2025 Daily Bus Rates by SGASD
Let’s Dig In: It’s About Who We’re Transporting and Where
It’s not just how much we pay per day, it’s how many students require transportation, how far they travel, and what kind of support those trips require. That brings us to specialized transportation, which includes services for students experiencing homelessness, attending out-of-district placements, or needing door-to-door service due to an IEP. These trips often involve longer distances, multiple vehicles, additional personnel, and individualized scheduling.
Understanding the Cost of Specialized Transportation
SGASD is committed to meeting the specialized needs of our students, but doing so comes with significant logistical and financial challenges. To better understand how SGASD compares to other similar-sized districts in York County, we looked at seven key categories of specialized transportation among three other school districts, Red Lion, South Eastern, and Dover, for the 2024-25 school year. When you look beyond general education routes and into specialized transportation, the picture becomes clearer. SGASD transports more students in high-need or logistically complex categories than many of our peer districts, which drives up our total cost.
- Homeless Students Transported – 49 students: SGASD ranks highest among the four districts, more than double the next closest (Dover with 24). These routes are often long and cross district lines, as we’re required by law to transport students experiencing homelessness or in foster care to their school of origin, regardless of where they temporarily reside.
- ELL/ESL Students Outside the Attendance Zone – 18 students: SGASD is the only district among the comparison group reporting students in this category. Unlike some other districts that provide English Learner services at each elementary school, SGASD currently centralizes all ELL/ESL instruction at Spring Grove Elementary. This means students who live closer to other schools (Paradise Elementary and New Salem Elementary) must be transported across the district to receive support. While this approach helps us concentrate staffing and resources, it also increases transportation costs. Other districts may avoid these transportation costs by incurring higher staffing costs instead. Each strategy has tradeoffs, and districts make decisions based on what best meets the needs of their students and staffing models.
-
Special Education Placements – 48 students: SGASD again ranks highest, slightly above Dover (46) and nearly three times the number transported by Red Lion (16). These students are placed in programs outside of SGASD because their needs cannot be met in-district, requiring long-distance and often individualized transportation services.
- Non-Public School Transportation – 21 schools / 191 students: SGASD transports students to 21 non-public schools, 20 of which are located outside the district, the highest number of out-of-district non-public schools among the four districts. We also transport 191 non-public school students, the second highest total behind Red Lion. These routes span multiple towns and counties, adding layers of complexity and cost due to distance, scheduling, and fewer students per route.
While SGASD transports fewer students overall than Red Lion (3,979 vs. 5,387), the type and complexity of our routes, especially in categories where we lead the county, are what drive costs higher. Simply put:
More specialized needs = more complex and costly transportation.
Types of Specialized Transportation by SGASD
Committed to Efficiency, Responsible Stewardship, and Continuous Improvement
SGASD uses Transfinder, a school bus routing software, to help design and evaluate our transportation system. This tool allows us to analyze ride times, stop locations, and student assignments so we can make data-informed decisions that enhance both safety and efficiency. Still, we recognize the need to continually balance high-quality service with responsible spending. That’s why this summer, we’re taking a closer look at how our system operates, and where we can improve. Here are several areas we’re actively exploring:
- Analyzing bus stop density: We will review the number and distribution of bus stops to identify opportunities for safe consolidation, shortening routes and helping keep runs within the contracted 4.5-hour daily driving limit.
- Reviewing van usage: Specialized and one-off van routes will be evaluated to determine whether they can be consolidated, combined with existing routes, or transitioned to other vehicle types.
- Optimizing non-public school transportation: We’re exploring whether more non-public students can ride existing bus routes rather than separate van trips, especially in areas where overlap already exists.
- Evaluating a transportation terminal site: We will assess the viability of building a transportation terminal on district-owned property. This could reduce “deadhead” miles (when buses travel empty to start routes), improve dispatch efficiency, and strengthen oversight of operations.
- Exploring decentralized EL/ESL services: Currently, all English Learner services are provided at Spring Grove Elementary, which increases transportation demand across the district. We’ll be studying whether EL support can be offered at each elementary building, allowing students to attend their home schools and reducing transportation time and cost.
- Assessing ride times and bell schedules: We will analyze whether minor adjustments to start/end times could help improve route efficiency, potentially reducing overlaps and extending driver availability across runs.
- Exploring cooperative/shared routes: We will continue discussions with neighboring districts to explore whether any shared or cooperative routes (especially for out-of-district special education placements or non-public schools) could reduce costs for all parties involved.
In Summary
SGASD’s transportation program is designed to serve students first, including those with complex or non-traditional needs. While that can result in higher total costs, we are committed to making smart, student-focused decisions that also improve cost-efficiency.
We appreciate your support as we work to optimize this essential service.