Skip To Main Content

Pennsylvania Cyber Charter School Funding Reform

Bar chart with large up arrow showing increase and laptop with cash on top of it.

What It Is, Why It Matters, & How You Can Help

What It Is

Cyber charter schools are tuition-free, online-only public schools that operate independently but are funded by local school districts. When a student living in the Spring Grove Area School District enrolls in a cyber charter, our district is required to pay that school a tuition fee—even though we have no oversight of their spending or academic performance. Most of these dollars come from property taxes that are raised at the local level.

The problem? Pennsylvania’s cyber charter schools have been operating since 2002, but the way they’re funded is still based on a 1997 law designed for brick-and-mortar charter schools. This outdated system means that:

  • Cyber charters receive the same tuition payments as in-person charter schools, even though they don’t have the same expenses (like transportation, school buildings, and on-site student services).
     

  • Tuition rates vary widely because each school district calculates its own rate based on local expenses—not on the actual cost of educating a student in a cyber charter. This results in vastly different tuition payments for students receiving the same online education.

Because of this broken funding model, SGASD and other districts are overpaying millions to cyber charters that is being spent on things unrelated to educating students. This drains local education budgets and shifts critical resources away from our students. 

It is important to note that this issue is not about limiting school choice. It's about pro-fiscal responsibility. The call for a reform is solely focused on ensuring that taxpayer dollars are spent responsibly and that cyber charter schools are funded based on actual costs. Without reform, this outdated system will continue to place an unnecessary financial burden on taxpayers while failing to improve student outcomes. View the websites below to see how taxpayer dollars have been used by cyber charter schools.

Hand writing "What can you do?" in blue marker.

How You Can Help

Contact your legislators to tell them we need charter funding reform now.

Senator Kristin Phillips-Hill

Representative Seth Grove

Representative Kate Klunk


Not Sure What to Say?

Use these templates. You can download the documents and make them your own. 

Sample Talking Script

Parent/Guardian Letter/Email

SGASD Staff Member Letter/Email

Community Member Letter/Email

Letter/Email for Any Constituent

 


The Case for Change: Audit Results, Recent Wins, and the Road Forward 

line drawing of magnifying glass on paper with check marks and graphs behind it.


PA Auditor General Cyber Charter Performance Audit

“I am now the third auditor general to look at this issue and the third to come to the same conclusion: the cyber charter funding formula needs to change to reflect what is actually being spent to educate students and set reasonable limits to the amount of money these schools can keep in reserve.”

Auditor General DeFoor

A note regarding the audit:

Some legislators have noted that the Auditor General’s 2024 report uses data from before the latest reforms in the 2024–25 state budget. While that is true, the report still reveals fundamental flaws in the way Pennsylvania funds cyber charter schools — flaws that remain largely unresolved.

Until the state adopts a funding model that aligns with the actual cost of cyber education, school districts will remain under financial strain, and taxpayers will continue to overpay.

Icon of person standing at beginning of a path to a finish flag


Recent Reforms: A Step Forward, But Not the Finish Line

In response to calls from public school districts across Pennsylvania, the 2024–25 state budget introduced several reforms to cyber charter school operations and funding. We sincerely thank our local legislators and the Governor for taking these important first steps. These efforts show a growing recognition that the current funding model places an unsustainable burden on public schools and taxpayers. However, they fall short of addressing the full scope of the issue.

Lightbulb icon


Proposed Reforms: Turning Momentum Into Meaningful Change

We advocate for commonsense reforms to fix the broken charter school funding system:

  1. End Overpayments to Cyber Charter Schools: Develop a more equitable funding formula that is in line with the actual cost of educating a child in a virtual environment. Governor Shapiro has suggested a statewide base tuition of $8,000 per student, saving taxpayers $278 million annually.
     

  2. Apply the State’s Special Education Formula to Charter Schools: Ensure funding matches the actual cost of educating students with disabilities.
     

  3. Increase Accountability & Transparency: Charter schools are exempt from any educational mandates that public school districts must follow. Require charter schools to meet the same financial and academic standards as traditional public schools.
     

  4. Strengthen Local Control: Limit the power of the unelected Charter Appeals Board to overturn local school board decisions.
     

  5. Prevent Discriminatory Enrollment & Discipline Practices: Ensure charter schools serve all students equitably.

Why It Matters written on a post it note with blurred background

Why It Matters

Taxpayer Dollars Are Wasted: Charter school tuition rates are not based on what it costs them to educate its students. It's based on school district expenses, leading to excessive payments. (Source: Education Voters of Pennsylvania)
 

Lack of Accountability: Unlike public schools, cyber charter schools operate with minimal oversight, spending tax dollars on non-educational expenses like advertising, lobbying, and excessive executive compensation.
 

Academic Performance Concerns: A study in 2019 by CREDO, the Center for Research on Education Outcomes at Stanford University, showed that cyber charter students perform significantly worse than their peers in traditional schools, losing an average of 106 days in reading and 118 days in math annually.
 

Significant Budget Burden: The high cost of cyber charter tuition takes away key funds that could have a significant impact on our school community. For the 2025-2026 school year, SGASD estimates a $3,882,799.06 expenditure to cyber charter schools.

 


Hands holding a tablet with charts and graphs on it and papers and notebooks with graphs and numbers underneath.

How Do Cyber Charter Schools Compare?

Note: The charts and graphs below are best viewed on a desktop. If using a mobile device, please turn it horizontally. 

Understanding the impact of cyber charter school funding requires looking at more than just the cost—it’s also important to compare student outcomes. The charts below highlight key differences between Spring Grove Area School District and the three cyber charter schools that most of our students choose: Commonwealth Charter Academy (CCA), Pennsylvania Cyber, and Reach Cyber.

We’ve provided a side-by-side comparison of PSSA and Keystone testing results, graduation rates, and tuition costs to give our community a clearer picture of how cyber charter schools perform academically compared to our district. These data points help illustrate how taxpayer dollars are being spent and the results they produce.

Expand the tabs below to explore how cyber charter schools measure up.